Acme Corp · network economics

Renewing the same support tier everywhere?

Modeled sample estate: weighted across 11 comparable segments, third-party maintenance comes out 32.6% below OEM next-business-day support over five years. Support prices include synthetic assumptions. Netos compares support choices across the modeled estate; the other cases show energy, refresh, automation and total cost separately.

221

complete model runs

3.6 million

device-months assessed

About 457,000

forecast rows

The estate

The footprint behind every question

A single audited network inventory grounds every case.

5,932

devices

394

sites

110

countries

Sites by tier

Branch
324
Campus
46
Data center
11
Headquarters
13

Devices by region

APAC
1,283
Americas
1,953
EMEA
2,696

Largest country fleets

  • United States1,247
  • United Kingdom726
  • Japan253
  • Australia210

Leading manufacturers

  • Cisco4,029
  • HP Aruba446
  • Arista372
  • Meraki340

Lifecycle cohorts

Devices reaching end of support by year

2026

202

2027

1,196

2028

1,544

2029

944

2030

148

2031

324

Upcoming 2026–2031 window. Earlier cohorts and 368 devices without an end-of-support date are excluded.

Explore the cases

Five questions for better decisions

Each comparison answers its own question, against its own stated baseline.

01 · Support

Which support approach fits each part of the estate?

A customer-held spare has a modeled saving of 65.8% vs standard OEM next-business-day support in Campus sites in Americas. Public-sector contract ceiling prices are higher than the synthetic prices they replaced. This raises the baseline by 8.1% and raises the savings of the alternatives. Weighted third-party savings are 32.6% across 11 comparable segments; customer-held spare savings are 61.4% across 3.

NASPO ValuePoint Cisco contract ceiling prices, effective 2026-10-01. Annual term (owner ruling; consistent with catalog structure and reseller listings; not stated in the NASPO catalog).

NASPO-priced / estate devices by vendor

Cisco
790 / 4,029
Meraki
0 / 340
Palo Alto
0 / 12
HPE / Aruba
0 / 546
Arista
0 / 372
Fortinet
0 / 193
APC / Schneider
0 / 160
Opengear
0 / 80
Juniper
0 / 70
Dell
0 / 15
Brocade
0 / 6
F5
0 / 6
Checkpoint
0 / 4

Support remains synthetic for Cisco (models without a NASPO price match), Meraki, Palo Alto, HPE / Aruba, Arista, Fortinet, APC / Schneider, Opengear, Juniper, Dell, and Checkpoint. Devices without an available support price remain unpriced. Passive equipment (Corning and Panduit) is excluded: support pricing does not apply.

Explore support

65.8%

Modeled saving vs standard OEM next-business-day support

Matched Cisco support uses published NASPO contract ceiling prices; other support prices and spare policy remain synthetic.

02 · Energy

What does it cost to power the estate?

Vendor datasheets show 12.5% lower device power for 286 of 2,384 devices with a verified replacement pair. This is not a whole-estate or electricity-cost saving. Published-tariff branch power spans $154–$915 per powered device-year.

Explore energy

$154–$915

Branch energy, published tariffs, US dollars per device-year

Published tariffs; synthetic high tariff view excluded.

03 · Refresh timing

When and how should end-of-support hardware be refreshed?

Third-party extension saves 75.0% on an undiscounted basis against replacement at end of support for the Cisco successor, 2029 cohort, Europe, Middle East and Africa. Replacing now instead of at end of support raises five-year cost NPV by 0.0%–31.4% across comparable segments. 8.0% discount rate (assumption). Undiscounted totals are equal for replacement timing alone; rising post-end-of-support cost is not modeled.

Explore refresh timing

75.0%

Undiscounted saving from third-party extension vs replacement at end of support · Cisco successor, 2029 cohort, Europe, Middle East and Africa

Synthetic inputs: successor hardware and third-party support prices.

04 · Cost stack

What makes up the cost of running each part of the estate?

Hardware makes up 47.4% of modeled five-year cost for branch sites in Europe, Middle East and Africa, and labor 28.4%. The data center mix is indicative because few data center models have a priced successor.

Explore cost stack

47.4%

five-year cost composition, branch sites in Europe, Middle East and Africa

Synthetic inputs: other hardware and support prices.

05 · Automation

What does automating network changes save at different scales?

The full automation, United States, 1,000 devices, high change, normal criticality scenario has a modeled saving of 85.1% vs manual work at the same change volume and scale.

Explore automation

85.1%

Modeled saving vs manual work

Synthetic inputs: automation tooling costs, change volume and criticality.