- Largest undiscounted saving
- 75.0%
- Largest undiscounted driver
- 57.0 pts
- Modeled runs
- 50
Third-party extension · 2029 EMEA · Cisco path
Refresh choice across the modeled estate · undiscounted percentage points
Across year, region and path
Discounted view
Five-year cost NPV by refresh choice
Positive NPV means spend. The table shows NPV per device-year for each comparable path, support-end cohort and region. 8.0% discount rate (assumption); end-of-year cash flows.
Arista alternative · 2029 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- Insufficient data
- At end of support
- $285
- Third-party extension
- $233
Arista alternative · 2029 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $558
- At end of support
- $457
- Third-party extension
- $306
Arista alternative · 2029 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,164
- At end of support
- $919
- Third-party extension
- $268
Cisco successor · 2026 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $495
- At end of support
- $495
- Third-party extension
- $304
Cisco successor · 2026 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $762
- At end of support
- $762
- Third-party extension
- $559
Cisco successor · 2026 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $550
- At end of support
- $550
- Third-party extension
- $341
Cisco successor · 2027 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,606
- At end of support
- $1,421
- Third-party extension
- $367
Cisco successor · 2027 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,122
- At end of support
- $1,028
- Third-party extension
- $473
Cisco successor · 2027 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,344
- At end of support
- $1,222
- Third-party extension
- $455
Cisco successor · 2028 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $696
- At end of support
- $568
- Third-party extension
- $176
Cisco successor · 2028 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $982
- At end of support
- $833
- Third-party extension
- $347
Cisco successor · 2028 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $836
- At end of support
- $697
- Third-party extension
- $257
Cisco successor · 2029 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $883
- At end of support
- $672
- Third-party extension
- $233
Cisco successor · 2029 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,323
- At end of support
- $1,020
- Third-party extension
- $306
Cisco successor · 2029 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,198
- At end of support
- $945
- Third-party extension
- $268
Cisco successor · 2030 · Americas
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $999
- At end of support
- $792
- Third-party extension
- $348
Cisco successor · 2030 · Asia Pacific
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $1,005
- At end of support
- $798
- Third-party extension
- $356
Cisco successor · 2030 · EMEA
NPV in USD per device-year
- Replace now
- $990
- At end of support
- $782
- Third-party extension
- $333
Replacing now instead of at end of support raises five-year cost NPV by 0.0%–31.4% across comparable segments. Sensitivity: 5.0% discount rate (assumption): 0.0%–19.0%; 12.0% discount rate (assumption): 0.0%–49.1%. Rising post-end-of-support cost: not modeled. Hardware and third-party support prices in this refresh comparison are synthetic inputs.
The comparison
Where extension changes the cost
Undiscounted saving from third-party extension against replace at end of support on the same vendor path, support-end year and region. Percentages are shown where both costs are available.
| Year | Americas | EMEA | APAC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 33.4% | 34.0% | 23.9% |
| 2027 | 74.7% | 63.2% | 54.3% |
| 2028 | 71.5% | 65.9% | 61.4% |
| 2029 | 70.0% | 75.0% | 74.4% |
| 2030 | 61.5% | 62.8% | 60.8% |
| Year | Americas | EMEA | APAC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | |||
| 2027 | |||
| 2028 | |||
| 2029 | 26.0% | 74.3% | 39.7% |
| 2030 |
Insufficient data: no priced alternative mapping. The Arista path is modeled only where a priced mapping exists.
Chart note: hardware prices and third-party support prices in this comparison are synthetic scenario inputs. The separate support coverage case uses NASPO ValuePoint Cisco contract ceiling prices, effective 2026-10-01 for matched Cisco devices. Annual term (owner ruling; consistent with catalog structure and reseller listings; not stated in the NASPO catalog). Savings compare modeled costs, not Acme’s observed spend. Third-party extension has the same cost under both vendor paths; the cost is shown once in the concrete comparison below. Device hardware only; components are excluded.
The undiscounted driver
The choice matters most
Across the modeled estate, refresh choice changes undiscounted modeled saving by 57.0 percentage points. Support-end year is next at 11.9 percentage points.
What moves the number
- Choose the action. Compare extending support with replace at end of support before setting a purchase date.
- Sequence by support-end year. The year changes how long a purchase stays inside the model window.
- Price the successor path. Use the Arista alternative only where a comparable priced mapping exists.
What was not measured
The Arista replacement path lacks a priced alternative mapping in 12 year-and-region positions. Those positions remain insufficient data; they are not assumed to match the Cisco path.
Arista / 2029 / Americas / replace now — Not modeled: no separate run for this comparison.
Components and financing are outside this device-hardware comparison. Rising post-end-of-support cost: not modeled.
A concrete comparison
For the 2029 EMEA cohort: Extension — applies to both paths: $326 per device-year. Cisco replace at end of support: $1,304 per device-year. That is the 75.0% undiscounted saving shown above for third-party extension on the Cisco path.
Cisco replacement now is also $1,304 per device-year over this undiscounted window.
Method and inputs
The 2026–2030 support-end cohorts are compared over 5 years. Costs are normalized per device-year. Third-party extension applies to both vendor paths and is shown once in the underlying cost comparison; it does not imply a successor purchase.
Sourced
- Lifecycle dates and estate records
Synthetic
- Successor hardware and third-party support prices
The Acme cases describe separate decisions and are never added together.